Stephanie Fierman Isn’t Going Off The Candy Cliff This Time
Thursday March 05th 2009, 1:41 pm
Filed under: ad agency,advertising,blogs,branding,Internet,market research,retail,web 2.0

Skittles’ foray into the social media universe had the marketing blogosphere and Twitterverse on overdrive week.skittlescom-interweb-the-rainbow-taste-the-rainbow_2009_3_7_134943815.png

On Tuesday, Mars replaced the candy’s “normal” website with a live feed from Twitter.com of tweets that mentioned Skittles.  If you click HERE, you’ll get a current snapshot of what that site might have looked like several days ago when this experiment first began, but things have calmed down dramatically since then.  When I took a look at the feed on that first day, there were tweets full of curse words,  comments such as “I found a finger in my bag of Skittles,” “Skittles are made from dead animals,” “Skittles gives you cancer and kills babies,”  “Eating Skittles will kill your parents” and so on.

In other words, the idea that anything in a tweet would instantly appear at skittles.com brought adults out of the woodwork to see just how outrageous and inappropriate they could be before Skittles changed strategy.  Alas, all these tweets did appear on the site, and it was child’s play (pardon the pun) to get around the site’s age verification tool in order to see every word. 

That’s just dumb – and dangerous.  If one 8-year old had done something awful as a result of viewing some sort of silly fake directive as to what to do with Skittles… Mars would have had an enormous and entirely self-provoked communications disaster on its hands.

So while many marketers labeled Skittles’ experiment as bold and exciting, I stand with a minority who is not with the “lemmings” on this one.   The site started as a confusing mish-mash of wildly unacceptable language attached to a candy, and has since evolved into the most boring site in the category. 

Social media is not an end in itself.  No tactic ever is.  Advertising’s goal is to create goodwill and sales among a product’s target market. Will this effort do that?  No.  And did the stunt bring non-buyers out in droves?  You bet.

While Mars (or its ad agency) may certainly win some wacky 2009 social media award when all is said and done, look for the company to announce that this “successful experiment” has come to an end, and that it is returning to a more standard interactive (and managed) site.  It couldn’t happen soon enough.


No Comments so far
Leave a comment



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)