Take a look at the June cover of Glamour Magazine at right (if you cannot see image, click HERE):
The photo of three attractive models on the cover is accompanied by the headline, “Curvy? Skinny? It’s All Good!” But… which one is the curvy one? Is it the one on the far right? The far left? It’s the one on the left. Yes, I said the one on the left. I’ve added a couple other images of said model to this post (HERE and HERE), and let me tell you: any woman whose thighs (or other body parts) do not aggressively touch when at steady state is not “curvy” in my book.
I truly don’t understand this particular one, because no woman who is overweight believes she is also a thin model. The average American woman wears a size 14 – and knows it. She does not think that Crystal Renn is her spitting image. Hair, cellulite, make-up, the size of one’s pores: the savvy woman generally knows that all of these can be drastically manipulated ad – sadly – some women still aspire to these things. But chubby and frolicking in one’s bikini in a magazine? No.![]()
Then why the fixation on imaginary weight claims? Is it advertisers? And if so, go all out so an advertiser targeting a real plus-size girl might actually be able to see a real one. There is no real-life party that is served well by this kind of activity.
I suppose I should just be thankful that Glamour didn’t pull a Ralph Lauren and get all drunk and stupid on Photoshop: see the related blog post I wrote and lovingly titled, “Can Someone Get That Turkey A Sandwich (you’ll have to read it to know why). Do you think the average person knows that even photographs of food are fake?
No wonder people still don’t trust advertising. Sometimes – a lot of the time – we lie.
No Comments so far
Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>




